In this article we will discuss about the merits and demerits of Bentham and Hooker’s system. Merits of Bentham and Hooker’s System: 1. The description of families and genera is very accurate. 2. The system is very handy for identification purposes. 3. The system is of great practical convenience. The British and Commonwealth herbaria therefore […]
Bentham and Hooker System: Merits and Demerits
Article Shared by 
Swingle’s Principles for Plant Classification
Article Shared by
The following points highlight the thirty-six important Swingle’s principles for plant classification. Swingle’s Principle # 1. Plant relationships are up and down genetic lines and these must constitute the framework of phylogenetic taxonomy. Swingle’s Principle # 2. Some evolutionary processes are progressive while others are regressive. Swingle’s Principle # 3. Evolution does not necessarily involve […]
Comparison among Different Systems of Plant Classification
Article Shared by
Learn about the comparison among Bentham and Hooker, Engler and Prantl, and Hutchinson systems of plant classification. Comparison # Bentham and Hooker: 1. It is a natural system and mostly used for practical purposes. 2. It is based on A.P de Candolle’s system (1818). 3. Classification is based on single and mostly artificial characters; so […]
This is a question and answer forum for students, teachers and general visitors for exchanging articles, answers and notes. Answer Now and help others.
Answer Now
Answer Now
Here's how it works:
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
Powered by WordPress. Designed by 